Screen Robot
  • Movie News
  • TV News
  • Gaming
    • Xbox Games
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
    • Amazon Prime
    • Now TV
    • Disney Plus
  • Trailers
  • Screen News
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
Screen Robot
  • Movie News
  • TV News
  • Gaming
    • Xbox Games
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
    • Amazon Prime
    • Now TV
    • Disney Plus
  • Trailers
  • Screen News
No Result
View All Result
Screen Robot
No Result
View All Result

Under the Skin, or: How a surreal sci-fi cracked the UK top ten

Rachel Carlyon by Rachel Carlyon
21st March 2014
in Movie News
18 1
0
Under the Skin, or: How a surreal sci-fi cracked the UK top ten
39
SHARES
146
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Has Jonathan Glazer’s Under the Skin found success through its combination of style, star and Glasgow?

Under the Skin has invaded the UK box office at number ten this week, which is a happy surprise for what is undoubtedly a very challenging and often surreal science fiction film, one that just happens to star one of Hollywood’s most famous actresses of the moment: Scarlett Johansson. In my opinion, the film is probably going to be the best of the year (yep, calling it now) and director Jonathan Glazer should be a superstar auteur along the lines of Quentin Tarantino or Wes Anderson. However, Glazer’s penchant for taboo subject matter and the ten years it took to get Under the Skin on to screens has kept him in the shadow of his more popular contemporaries.

Under the Skin is an extraordinary film, but not an entirely accessible one. Is Scarlett Johansson’s star power enough to fill seats?

Under the Skin is a dark, surreal and disturbing rumination on what it means to be human, and by stripping the story right down to the bone, Glazer is able to focus on looking at the world through truly alien eyes. This “otherness” is reflected in the gorgeous cinematography, incendiary film score and Johansson’s tactile performance. It is an extraordinary film, but not an entirely accessible one. So how come Under the Skin is already a strong contender at the box office? Is Scarlett Johansson’s star power enough to fill seats? Perhaps its Glaswegian setting is filling a demand for films based in the UK – or are audiences just more switched on than Hollywood gives them credit for?

The most obvious factor is the presence of Johansson. She has one of the most recognisable faces in Hollywood at the moment, not only for her blockbuster status as a member of Marvel’s The Avengers; even the recent controversy surrounding her advertising deal with SodaStream has kept Johansson in the public eye. Much like Nicole Kidman’s involvement in Glazer’s previous film, Birth, Under the Skin is a showcase for a known Hollywood actress, proving her dramatic chops outside of the usual mainstream fare while using her considerable box office clout to boost audience numbers on an otherwise little-known film.

More on Glazer’s previous film: Is it time Birth got a re-appraisal?

U

Another contributing factor could be the film’s elements of cinéma vérité, and its primary setting in the city of Glasgow. One of Glazer’s coups de grâce was to install eight hidden cameras inside a van and have Johansson actually drive through the streets of Glasgow, interacting with real men who just happened by. This presentation results in a view of a familiar landscape and its inhabitants, but with a step removed; we feel a sense of realism and surrealism simultaneously. The use of real locations and people adds a personal touch – we all like to see familiar elements from our lives reflected back to us in cinema.

Perhaps the strongest contributing factor to Under the Skin’s box office success is its audience appreciation

Sure, it’s purposely warped to give us an alien view of what we have come to take for granted, but maybe that’s what we want as well. We also go to the cinema to escape everyday life, so to not only have it reflected back at us but to have it done with a distorted mirror resonates even more than it would otherwise. This is perhaps the strongest contributing factor to Under the Skin’s box office success: audience appreciation. The producers of Hollywood blockbusters think that, to make the most money, they must make the loudest, most obnoxious film there is to draw people into the cinema, out of a sense of curiosity because of the sheer amount of noise it makes. They shudder to think that audiences want to actually be engaged in something interesting or, God forbid, even challenging.

We want to go to the cinema to have a good time. 300: Rise of an Empire is loud and brash and cost millions of dollars, but we go to these films more out of habit than anything else. Under the Skin’s current, if comparatively modest, box office success proves there may be a considerable number of us who are fed up with the same old same old. It proves we’re looking for something else – something fulfilling. Something that asks more questions than it answers, the complete opposite of the blockbusters, which don’t really ask anything of us at all, except maybe for all of our money.

 

Not all of us fell for Under the Skin: Is the film really just cinematic purgatory?

 

All images: StudioCanal

Tags: filmJonathan GlazerScarlett JohanssonUnder the Skin
Previous Post

Five great British prison films

Next Post

Defending 12 Years a Slave against the critics

Next Post
Defending 12 Years a Slave against the critics

Defending 12 Years a Slave against the critics

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

KNICKER SNIFFERThe ultimate prank by post

Readers Favourites

It’s Time You Watched: The Blacklist

It’s Time You Watched: The Blacklist

6th October 2014
216
Duke Nukem: Can he rule again?

Duke Nukem: Can he rule again?

6th April 2014
195
Cyberpunk 2077 delayed, again :-(

Cyberpunk 2077 delayed, again :-(

28th October 2020
143
Commitment vs craft: What’s more important to screen acting?

Commitment vs craft: What’s more important to screen acting?

13th March 2014
250
Why Insidious is the best supernatural horror since The Blair Witch

Why Insidious is the best supernatural horror since The Blair Witch

11th September 2013
312
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Menu
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2020 screenrobot.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Movie News
  • TV News
  • Gaming
    • Xbox Games
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
    • Amazon Prime
    • Now TV
    • Disney Plus
  • Trailers
  • Screen News

© 2020 Screen Robot

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.